Recently one of the first AI based device cleared by FDA for use in
primary care, was peer criticized for its clinical limitations - it could only
diagnose a single disease. Also, peers could not understand how a $18,000 piece
of medical equipment that was also needed, that could diagnose a single eye
disease condition, be “for-use” in Primary Care. The criticism also extended to
the fact that the “autonomous” diagnosis related only to the possibility of
this disease beyond its minor presence.
The peers understood that although effective for that one specific
disease condition, the patient would be mis-lead into believing everything was “ok”,
when they could in reality be suffering from the many other eye related
diseases that were not ruled out, not supported by that device.
No matter how clear the disclaimers to that effect, patients simply will
never understand that limitation – they want to believe the device has absolute
powers!
Specialised single disease diagnostic devices are “dangerous” for use in
Primary Care, whether AI based or not. They can be easily misunderstood and misused
as they are too specialized, too limited and too expensive to effectively
provide widespread screening benefits to potential patients. They don’t provide
a comprehensive answer, as expected by patients.
And, in the age of “Dr. Google”, patients believe they are extremely
health savvy, sometimes for the good, sometimes not! These internet doctors
spread not only generalist health advice, but mainly also fear. It is this fear
that drives patients to diagnostic medical devices to provide the medical
“truth”. Single or limited first use devices in Primary Care don’t always
measure up.
The best but little-known example of a limited diagnosis device which is
widely used in Primary is the ECG! Surprised
Don’t be, you’re not alone. Few understand the limitations of ECG, which
because of its electrical nature is seriously limited in functionality as it can
only detect diseases that have an electrical signature. This means it is
limited to about 44% of all common heart diseases, and this only when AI and
algorithmically augmented.
This is why most Standards of Care, a cardiologist must “over-read” the ECG
before the clinician can discuss it with the patient. Basically, the medical
community is admitting that ECG is only effective on less than ½ of all common
heart diseases.
No surprise therefore that is has not been adopted for the widespread
screening of patients in Primary Care – able to detect only ~44% of all common
heart disease, its simply not suitably effective – and that makes it dangerous!
It continues to be used because for the diseases it can detect, it does
it really well. But mainly, it continues to be used for lack of a any better
device for decades.
Now enter AI in Primary Care, and see a positive example:
Cardio-HART™ or CHART for short, is an AI powered, first-use, non-invasive, diagnostic system that together with the FDA cleared Cardio-TriTest™ device, provides clinicians with a better more complete understanding of a patient’s overall cardiac status - because it can detect and diagnose ~94% of all common heart diseases.
Now enter AI in Primary Care, and see a positive example:
Cardio-HART™ or CHART for short, is an AI powered, first-use, non-invasive, diagnostic system that together with the FDA cleared Cardio-TriTest™ device, provides clinicians with a better more complete understanding of a patient’s overall cardiac status - because it can detect and diagnose ~94% of all common heart diseases.
94% is “the” definition of clinical effectiveness, especially for
Primary Care.
Designed essentially for us in Primary Care, Chart outputs a broader range of disease findings and parameters than ECG. CHART provides 64 findings and 167 heart parameters, including all those provided ECG.
No other single diagnostic device in existence today can provide such a wide-ranging scope of cardiac status for use in Primary Care.
With 1 in 3 Americans at risk of heart disease and combined with an aging population, AI can supercharge Primary Care and provide patients with proper CHART.
Dr Google would approve.
I seems like the future is Dr Google. :) If it like this, AI could replace doctors altogether. Almost. AIs will definitely play a supporting role in the healthcare industry, in the near future, serving as a powerful tool that will help human workers do their jobs more efficiently and effectively.
ReplyDeleteHi! I would rather say that human factor in health generally, cannot be replaced with AI. It is often that an answer is a spectrum of possibilities, rather than a discreet answer, and asking more questions just makes it more complex. In these cases relationship between the patient and the doctor matters. Also, the time is a crucial factor of a diagnosis, because a disease doesn't appear during a blink of an eye. It has a history. Doctor + AI in the right proportion could be the best solution.
ReplyDelete